United States v. Ronald Santora, Earl Rardin, Maurice Eugene Lickteig, Theresa Sohn, Garth Jon Brian Upton, Roy Cohn, Mary Evans, and Walter P. Moore

Good Law
583 F.2d 453·1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8580
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 197876-3440, 76-3446, 76-3485, 76-3521, 76-3525, 76-3567, 76-3711 and 77-2626California9,324 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hufstedler, J.

These consolidated appeals raise a series of issues relating to the validity, the interpretation and effect of four court orders authorizing FBI agents to wiretap several telephones and to permit FBI agents to break into a business premise for the purpose of installing, servicing, and removing an electronic listening device. With trivial exceptions, the Government’s cases rested upon evidence that was the product of electronic surveillance conducted pursuant to court orders. Each of the appellants filed motions to suppress evidence gathered by electronic surveillance and the fruit of the intercepted conversations. These consolidated appeals present a number of issues common to all > appellants, and others that relate to each individually.

The appeals arise from two separate indictments. One indictment charged 16 persons with various offenses involving traffic in stolen airline tickets. Santera, Evans, Lickteig, and Moore appeal from their convictions on various counts of the indictment charging stolen airline ticket offenses. The second indictment charged 11 persons with offenses involving traffic in controlled substances. Rardin, Cohn, Upton, and Sohn appeal from their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.