United States v. Ignacio Orozco-Rico

Good Law
589 F.2d 433
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 197978-1911California1,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hufstedler, J.

This appeal presents a question of first impression: Did the Government’s returning to Mexico alien witnesses, who might have impeached the Government’s testimony about founded suspicion to stop the vehicle driven by the defendant, violate his due process and compulsory process rights in a prosecution for status offenses ( 8 U.S.C. §§ 1325 , 1326)? We answer the question negatively, holding that United States v. Mendez-Rodriguez (9th Cir. 1971) 450 F.2d 1 does not apply in this situation.

On the evening of February 10,1978, two border patrol agents were watching northbound traffic on Interstate 5, near the San Clemente checkpoint. The checkpoint was temporarily closed. The agents saw a northbound 1967 Ford automobile as it traveled through the area lighted by the checkpoint floodlights. The vehicle was “riding low” and the windows were fogged, indicating to the border patrol officers that “there was a temperature in that car that wasn’t on the outside of the car.” The agents followed the Ford and saw only one person in the vehicle, the driver. One of the agents shined his light on the driver’s face to get his attention. The driver did not acknowledge the light, and he displayed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.