The Kissell Company v. Forrest Gressley and Emily Gressley, Husband and Wife, and Mountain View Garden Apartments

Good Law
591 F.2d 47
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 197976-3039California2,666 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

In this diversity case, Kissell, a mortgage banking company, appeals from judgment rendered against it for having wrongfully retained a mortgage on a piece of property after a description of that property was erroneously inserted into a mortgage to which Kissell was entitled as security for certain loans. The Gressleys and Mountain View Garden Apartments (hereinafter referred to collectively as Gressley) recovered $119,785.93 in actual and punitive damages on this count. Kissell also appeals from a determination that it charged a usurious rate of interest on the loans. Under Arizona law, a usurer must return to the borrower all interest paid on a usurious loan. Under this count, Gressley recovered an additional $27,850.00.

The facts show that Gressley, a housing developer in Arizona, signed loan agreements totalling $690,000 with Kissell in 1972. Of that amount, $52,000 was used to purchase the land, $73,000 was to be used to develop the land, and $565,000 was to be used to construct apartment dwellings on the land.

The loan agreements called for interest rates ranging between 7%% and 8V2%, or 2% over the prime rate at specified New York banks, adjusted according to which rate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.