Herschensohn v. Hoffman

Good Law
593 F.2d 893·201 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 721·27 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 445·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15954
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 197977-1718California3,538 words

Opinion

Opinion

593 F.2d 893 201 U.S.P.Q. 721 Arthur M. HERSCHENSOHN and Corona Hair Net Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robert M. HOFFMAN, Individually, Robert M. Hoffman, d/b/a Image Products Co. and Advanced Design Laboratories, Hoffman Beauty and Barber Supply Co., Hoffman Beauty and Barber Supply Co., d/b/a Image Products Co. and Advanced Design Laboratories, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 77-1718, 77-2638. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 26, 1979. R. Douglas Lyon (argued), of Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Ronald W. Reagin (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before CARTER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and CRAIG, District Judge. * JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 3,253,292 (hereafter No. 292), wherein the district court entered a Judgment that the patent was valid and infringed and awarded damages. This is Appeal No. 77-1718. 2 Thereafter, a Judgment was entered holding defendants in contempt for offering to sell their devices during the period between the receipt of a Memorandum of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.