Brodt v. Bache & Co., Inc.

Good Law
595 F.2d 459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 197976-1763California1,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

595 F.2d 459 Robert T. BRODT and Nancy J. Brodt, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BACHE & CO., INC., a Delaware Corporation, Commonwealth Commodities Corp., an Arizona Corporation, John Bergman and Jane Doe Bergman, his wife, Robert Plenge and Jane Doe Plenge, his wife, Randy Thomas and Jane Doe Thomas, his wife, Defendants-Appellees. No. 76-1763. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 13, 1978. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1979. 1 Jack E. Evans (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Arthur P. Greenfield (argued), Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. 4 Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. 5 KELLEHER, District Judge. 6 This case presents a question of whether a discretionary commodities trading account is an investment contract and therefore a security within the meaning of and subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a, Et seq. The District Court held that such an account was not an investment contract. We affirm. 7 During 1974 appellee Bergman, a registered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.