Port Of Astoria, Oregon v. Hodel

Good Law
595 F.2d 467
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 7, 197976-1049California6,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

595 F.2d 467 12 ERC 2044 , 9 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,252 PORT OF ASTORIA, OREGON, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, Concerned Citizens of Clatsop County, an Unincorporated Association, Dorothy Reikkola and Robert A. Fackler, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees, v. Donald Paul HODEL, Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, and Alumax Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants. Nos. 75-3465, 75-3621, 75-3699 and 76-1049. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 5, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1979. Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain (argued), Portland, Or., Larry Gutteridge (argued), Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants-cross appellees. James P. Rogers (argued), of Davies, Biggs, Strayer, Steol & Boley, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees-cross appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of oregon. Before KENNEDY and TANG, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. TANG, Circuit Judge. 1 This case consists of appeals and cross appeals from a judgment that held a power supply contract between the defendants valid, but unenforceable, until the contract's implications had been assessed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.