Peacock v. Board Of Regents

Good Law
597 F.2d 163·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15740
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 197976-3595California1,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

597 F.2d 163 Erle E. PEACOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITIES AND STATE COLLEGE OF ARIZONA, Jack R. Williams, Weldon P. Shofstall, Paul L. Singer, Sidney S. Woods, Gordon D. Paris, James E. Dunseath, Margaret M. Christy, Kenneth G. Bentson, Ralph M. Bilby, and Rudy E. Campbell, each of the foregoing Individually and in his or her capacity as a member of the Board of Regents of the Universities and State College of Arizona, John Lentz and Norman Sharber, each Individually, John P. Schaefer, Individually and in his capacity as President of the University of Arizona, Merlin K. Du Val, Individually and in his capacity as Vice President for Health Sciences and Acting Dean of the College of Medicine, University of Arizona, and Douglas H. Lindsey, Individually and in his capacity as Acting Head of the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 76-3595. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 2, 1979. 1 William Lee McLane (argued), McLane & McLane, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant. 2 William R. Jones, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. 3 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.