United States v. Martin

Caution
599 F.2d 880·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15955
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 197977-1272California5,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

599 F.2d 880 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MARTIN, Nolan Allen Hall, Searcy Baker Andrews, Charles Masao Johnson, a/k/a Chas, Stephen Bruce Davenport, a/k/a Steve Davenport, Lewis Nathaniel Dixon, a/k/a Baby Boy, B.B. and Pretty Boy Floyd, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 77-1271, 77-1272, 77-1281, 77-1282, 77-1338 and 77-1619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 26, 1979. Roger Ruffin, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Martin. William M. Goodman, Asst. Fed. Pub. Defender, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Hall. Marcus S. Topel, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants Johnson and Andrews. Stephen Heiser, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Davenport. Jerrold Ladar, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Dixon. Linda C. Jamieson, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., William J. Corcoran, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before WALLACE and HUG, Circuit Judges, and GRANT * , District Judge. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 Searcy Baker Andrews, Charles Johnson, Anthony Martin, Lewis Dixon, Nolan Hall and Stephen Davenport appeal from their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.