20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 533, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,092 David G. Bean, Carol G. Comstock, Juanita F. Davenport, Elizabeth Dickos, Russell L. Greer, Leonard Hardtke, Paul Vernon Kellerer, Hada v. Nicholson, William Gordon Oldham, Dale L. Quist, Theodore R. Sherburne, and Eva G. Willard, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Crocker National Bank

Good Law
600 F.2d 754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 197977-1822California3,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

600 F.2d 754 20 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 533 , 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,092 David G. BEAN, Carol G. Comstock, Juanita F. Davenport, Elizabeth Dickos, Russell L. Greer, Leonard Hardtke, Paul Vernon Kellerer, Hada V. Nicholson, William Gordon Oldham, Dale L. Quist, Theodore R. Sherburne, and Eva G. Willard, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-1822. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 13, 1979. David M. Blackman, David M. Blicker (argued), Blackmon, Wasserman & Blicker, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis D. Clark, Atty., Washington, D. C., for amicus, U. S. Dept. of Labor. James C. Paras, Bruce A. Nelson (argued), Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before CARTER, CHOY and BRIGHT, * Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellants, eleven former employees of the appellee Crocker National Bank (Crocker), appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action, brought on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, charging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.