20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1649, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,294 Sheryl Z. White v. City of San Diego, A.A. "Bud" Bigge, Ruben Dominguez, William G. Sage, R. W. King and Fred M. Conger

Good Law
605 F.2d 455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 197977-1195California3,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

605 F.2d 455 20 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1649 , 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,294 Sheryl Z. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, A.A. "Bud" Bigge, Ruben Dominguez, William G. Sage, R. W. King and Fred M. Conger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-1195. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 24, 1979. Sheridan Reed, Eckhardt, Reed & Reed, San Diego, Cal., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. John W. Witt, City Atty., San Diego, Cal., on brief, for defendants-appellees; Ted Bromfield, Deputy City Atty., San Diego, Cal., argued. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 White appeals a district court ruling that the City of San Diego (the City) and certain named defendants did not discriminate against her on the basis of sex in her attempts at promotion to higher level accounting positions with the City. We affirm. 2 * Although several factual issues are disputed, the basic sequence of events is clear. City accounting positions, ranked from highest to lowest, are principal accountant (a managerial position), senior accountant,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.