Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

605 F.2d 492 CA PC 79-3534 Nancy Anne SPANGLER, by her father and next friend, James E. Spangler, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Sharon Hughes Spangler, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. PASADENA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 77-2902, 77-2941 and 78-2266. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 20, 1979. 1 The concurring opinion of Judge Kennedy is amended as follows: 2 On slip op. page 1984, at the second line of the right-hand column, insert after "See " the following: Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, --- U.S. ----, ----, 99 S.Ct. 2282 , 60 L.Ed.2d 870 (1979) (" 'Discriminatory purpose,' however, implies more than intent as volition or intent as awareness of consequences."); Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979). 3 On slip op. page 1981, at the last line of the left-hand column, insert before "Especially" the following: See generally Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, --- U.S. ----, ----, 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) (Powell, dissenting). 4 On slip op. page 1986, at…