Seymour v. Hull & Moreland Engineering

Good Law
605 F.2d 1105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 197976-3232California7,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

605 F.2d 1105 102 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2995 , 87 Lab.Cas. P 11,604 CA 79-3693 Joseph H. SEYMOUR, Harold Edwards, C. W. Burke, John L. Connolly, Donald Meir, Richard L. Corbit, Robert Zahm, Arthur Preston, Gene Nicks, E. J. Strecker, H. C. Dennis and James Kirst, each in respective capacity as Trustee of the Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund, Joseph H. Seymour, Harold Edwards, C. V. Holder, John L. Connolly, Donald Meir, Richard L. Corbit, Robert Zahm, Arthur Preston, Steve Harrison, E. J. Strecker, H. C. Dennis, Gene Nicks, James Kirst and J. C. Maxwell, each in his respective capacity as Trustee of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HULL & MORELAND ENGINEERING, a partnership, and Hull-Moreland & Associates, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 12, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff in Intervention. No. 76-3232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 4, 1979. Wayne Jett, Los Angeles, Cal., Goldstein, Freedman, Ownbey & Klepetar, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Ronald J. Klepetar, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.