Wilderness Public Rights Fund, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. Thomas F. Kleppe, Secretary of Interior, Department of the Interior, Gary Everhardt, Director of the National Park Service, Howard H. Chapman, Regional Director of the Western Region of the National Park Service, and Merle Stitt, Superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park, Frederick B. Eiseman, Jr., and Margaret H. Eiseman, Husband and Wife, J. R. Hertzler, Michael St. Clair v. Thomas F. Kleppe, in His Capacity as Secretary of the U. S. Department of Interior, Gary Everhardt, in His Capacity as Director of the National Park Service, and Merle Stitt, in His Capacity as Superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park

Good Law
608 F.2d 1250
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 197977-1606California2,477 words

Opinion

Opinion

608 F.2d 1250 13 ERC 2094 , 9 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,769 WILDERNESS PUBLIC RIGHTS FUND, a nonprofit California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas F. KLEPPE, Secretary of Interior, Department of the Interior, Gary Everhardt, Director of the National Park Service, Howard H. Chapman, Regional Director of the Western Region of the National Park Service, and Merle Stitt, Superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park, Defendants-Appellees. Frederick B. EISEMAN, Jr., and Margaret H. Eiseman, husband and wife, J. R. Hertzler, Michael St. Clair, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas F. KLEPPE, in his capacity as Secretary of the U. S. Department of Interior, Gary Everhardt, in his capacity as Director of the National Park Service, and Merle Stitt, in his capacity as Superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 77-1606, 77-3693. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 1, 1979. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Dec. 17, 1979. Donald P. Nemir, Inc., San Francisco, Cal., Bruce E. Meyerson, Phoenix, Ariz., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Carl Strass, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendants-appellees; Richard S. Allemann, Asst. U. S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.