Victor Havas and Arlene Havas v. John T. Thornton

Good Law
609 F.2d 372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 197977-3139California2,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jameson, J.

Victor Havas and Arlene Havas, his wife, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, for damages and in-junctive relief, claiming a conspiracy to deprive them of their civil rights to liberty, property, and due process of law. They named as defendants various officials of the State of Nevada and Clark County, Nevada, and members and officers of the Metropolitan Police Department of Clark County, together with the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the State of Nevada. They appeal from a judgment dismissing the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action of their amended complaint and dismissing the entire action as to all defendants except five named police officers. We affirm.

Causes of action three through eight allege civil rights violations resulting from (1) the filing of a civil complaint by the office of the Attorney General of Nevada, Consumer Affairs Division, seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction against Ha-vas and alleging the unauthorized repair of a motor vehicle, deceptive and misleading advertising, and false and deceptive trade practices; and (2) an administrative action by the Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.