Nathaniel A. Boone v. Mechanical Specialties Company

Good Law
52 A.L.R. Fed. 212·609 F.2d 956·21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,458·21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 789·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9693
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 197977-3999California1,921 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

Boone appeals from the dismissal of his Title VII action against Mechanical Specialties Company (Mechanical). We find that the district court correctly found that Boone’s claim was barred by laches, and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Boone began working at Mechanical in 1960. He was discharged on October 17, 1969. Boone contends that his discharge was caused by racial discrimination. Mechanical counters this by claiming that it was Boone’s poor job performance and inability to get along with his fellow employees.

On October 29, 1969, Boone filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that he had been wrongfully discharged. And, on November 6, 1969, he filed a similar complaint with the California Fair Employment Practice Commission. This California charge was dismissed on May 11, 1970. Additionally, prior to his discharge, Boone had filed a discrimination charge with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance. This was dismissed on April 24, 1970, “as being unsubstantiated by fact.”

Meanwhile, Boone’s EEOC charge remained pending for almost seven years, until August 3, 1976, when Boone requested and received a right-to-sue letter. Finally, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.