Daniel Allan Woirhaye v. United States

Good Law
609 F.2d 1303·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 197977-3456California1,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trask, J.

Appellant Daniel Woirhaye brought an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Woirhaye seeks damages for injuries arising from a collision between the pickup truck he was driving and a Payloader operated by an employee of the Anaconda Job Corps Center, a federal agency. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that it was barred by the applicable limitations period. We affirm.

The controlling statutory provision is 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b), which provides:

This appeal raises the question of what constitutes a final denial for purposes of the above provision.

I

The accident giving rise to the alleged injuries occurred on February 18, 1975. In June 1975, Woirhaye filed a timely claim for damages with the Department of Labor. On March 12, 1976, the claims officer mailed to Woirhaye’s attorney, Wade Da-hood, a registered letter stating that the claim had been denied. The last paragraph of that letter said:

On March 31, 1976, Woirhaye’s doctor sent Dahood a final medical evaluation of the injuries. Dahood wrote to the Labor Department on April 15, 1976, requesting information concerning the procedure for amending the claim to present the new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.