United States v. Kathy Hudson

Good Law
55 A.L.R. Fed. 395·609 F.2d 1326·1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 197978-3404California1,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

After her motion to dismiss was denied without evidentiary hearing, Kathy Hudson was convicted in the Northern District of California on charges of passing counterfeit obligations and possession of counterfeit obligations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 . She was given a three-year suspended sentence and placed on two years probation. Hudson argues on appeal (1) that denying her motion to dismiss based on the breach of an alleged promise between a government agent and her co-defendant was error; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. We affirm.

Facts:

Two San Francisco police officers recognized John Russo, a person under surveillance by the San Francisco police, and decided to follow him. Russo and the appellant, Kathy Hudson, entered a vehicle and drove to Mission Street where Hudson entered two different stores while Russo remained outside. Hudson did not make any purchases at either of the stores.

Russo then picked up Hudson, made two U-turns, waited briefly in a parking lot, and proceeded to Beep’s Burgers. Upon arrival at Beep’s, Russo parked about three car lengths from the hamburger stand. Hudson and Russo entered Beep’s where Hudson ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.