Blair Foods, Inc. v. Ranchers Cotton Oil

Good Law
610 F.2d 665
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 198077-3439California4,244 words

Opinion

Opinion

610 F.2d 665 1980-1 Trade Cases 63,104 BLAIR FOODS, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. RANCHERS COTTON OIL, a corporation; William A. Burns, an Individual; and Glen-Webb & Company of San Francisco, Inc., a corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants-Appellees. No. 77-3439. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 2, 1980. 1 Daniel S. Mason, Furth, Fahrner & Wong, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellant. 2 Benjamin H. Parkinson, Harvey Leiderman, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-counterclaimants-appellees; Philip E. Diamond, Landels, Ripley & Diamond, San Francisco, Cal., Ackerman, Johnston, Norberg, & Parkinson, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, * District Judge. BARTELS, District Judge: 5 Appellant Blair Foods, Inc., ("Blair") brought this private antitrust action under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 , seeking treble damages. Blair charged appellees Glen-Webb & Company of San Francisco, Inc., ("Glen-Webb"), Ranchers Cotton Oil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.