United States v. Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America, and State of Arizona, Intervenor and v. Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America, and County of Maricopa, Intervenor and v. Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States Attorney v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Nathan Jacques Warren, Sr., Real Party in Interest

Good Law
610 F.2d 680·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21685
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 198079-1081California2,415 words

Opinion

Opinion

610 F.2d 680 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nathan J. WARREN, Sr., Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and State of Arizona, Intervenor and Appellant, v. Nathan J. WARREN, Sr., Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and County of Maricopa, Intervenor and Appellant, v. Nathan J. WARREN, Sr., Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Nathan Jacques Warren, Sr., Real Party in Interest. Nos. 79-1081, 79-1082, 79-1084 and 79-7301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 3, 1980. Michael D. Hawkins, U. S. Atty., Frank L. Murray, David McCord, Phoenix, Ariz. (argued), Philip J. MacDonnell, Barnett S. Lotstein, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief, for plaintiff-appellant. Wm. H. McLean, Phoenix, Ariz., Norman Roy Grutman, New York City, for defendant-appellee; Stewart & McLean, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Nos. 79-1081; 79-1082; 79-1084). On petition for mandamus (No. 79-7301). Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS * , District Judge. GOODWIN, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.