Church of Scientology of California, a Nonprofit Corporation, Plaintiff v. United States Department of the Army: Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the Army U. S. Intelligence Agency Major Aaron, Assistant Chief of Staff for Army Intelligence, Church of Scientology of California, a Nonprofit Corporation, Plaintiff v. United States Department of Defense Office of the Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of the Department of Defense United States Department of the Navy J. Wm. Middendorf Ii, Secretary of the Navy Naval Intelligence Command: Rear Admiral E. F. Rectanus, Director of Naval Intelligence, Defendants

Caution
611 F.2d 738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 198078-1168California6,372 words

Opinion

Opinion

611 F.2d 738 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY: Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the Army; U. S. Intelligence Agency; Major Aaron, Assistant Chief of Staff for Army Intelligence, Defendants-Appellees. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; Office of the Secretary of Defense; James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of the Department of Defense; United States Department of the Navy; J. Wm. Middendorf II, Secretary of the Navy; Naval Intelligence Command: Rear Admiral E. F. Rectanus, Director of Naval Intelligence, Defendants- Appellees. Nos. 78-1168, 78-1169. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1979. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 7, 1980. As Modified. Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc in No. 78-1169 Rejected April 7, 1980. Barry Leigh Weissman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Barbara L. Herwig, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before TUTTLE, * TRASK, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.