Emanuel M. Comora v. Security Title Insurance Co., Etc., Emanuel M. Comora v. Security Title Insurance Co., Etc., and Safeco Title Insurance Co., and Wells Fargo National Bank, Defendants- Emanuel M. Comora v. Security Title Insurance Co., Etc., and Fierstein and Sturman

Good Law
614 F.2d 683
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 198078-1711California510 words

Opinion

Opinion

614 F.2d 683 Emanuel M. COMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE CO., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Emanuel M. COMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE CO., etc., et al., Defendants, and Safeco Title Insurance Co., and Wells Fargo National Bank, Defendants- Appellees. Emanuel M. COMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE CO., etc., et al., Defendants, and Fierstein and Sturman, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 78-1711, 78-2488 and 78-2489. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 29, 1980. Donald R. Colvin, Beverly Hills, Cal., argued for Emanuel M. Comora; James N. Laichas, Panorama City, Cal., on the brief. Mark I. Rosenberg, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Security Title Ins. Co., etc., et al.; Thomas E. Gallagher, Richard S. Odom, Los Angeles, Cal., James N. Laichas, Panorama City, Cal., Michael J. Matlaf, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before CHAMBERS, SNEED and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 In 1964 appellant Comora bought an apartment house in Los Angeles and gave the seller a note for $86,000. When the seller died, he attempted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.