United States v. Rudy Labinia

Good Law
614 F.2d 1207
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 198078-1695California1,337 words

Opinion

Opinion

Browning, J.

This appeal concerns the scope of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 , and the relation of the Hobbs Act to the Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 .

Rudy LaBinia and three accomplices kidnapped the wife and son of the manager of a branch of the First Hawaiian Bank. In a telephone call to the manager, LaBinia and his associates threatened to kill their hostages unless the manager left $400,000 for them at a specified vacant gas station. The plot was foiled by federal agents.

LaBinia ultimately pleaded guilty to a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (a) of affecting commerce by attempting to extort funds from the bank. Some seventeen months after sentencing, the district court granted LaBinia’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d) to withdraw his guilty plea. The district court also set aside the judgment and sentence and, in a separate order, dismissed the indictment. The United States appeals from both orders.

LaBinia’s co-defendant, Edward Alberti, was also charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (a), and was tried and convicted. His conviction was reversed by this court in United States v. Alberti, 558 F.2d 1038 (9th Cir. 1977) (unpublished memorandum).

The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.