James Dycus v. National Labor Relations Board
Opinion
Opinion
615 F.2d 820 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686 , 88 Lab.Cas. P 11,883 James DYCUS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42, IBTCWHA, Miscellaneous Warehousemen, Drivers & Helpers Local 986, IBTCWHA, and General Warehousemen Local 598, IBTCWHA, Charging Parties. No. 78-2285. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 22, 1980. David B. Finkel, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for petitioner; Neil M. Herring, Finkel & Herring, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. Andrew Tranovich, argued for respondent. 1 George A. Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 42; Pappy, Kaplon & Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. 2 Paul Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 598; Reich, Adell & Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. 3 Petition to Review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. 4 Before KENNEDY and HUG, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. * HUG, Circuit Judge: 5 James Dycus petitions this court for review of the order of the National Labor Relations Board dismissing the unfair labor practice complaint issued against Local 598, Local 986 and Joint Council 42, all labor organizations affiliated with…