22 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1053, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,806 Ann Cooney Moore v. The City of San Jose San Jose Police Department Ted Tedesco Clintonhilliard, and San Jose Peace Officers' Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant

615 F.2d 1265 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1053 , 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,806 Ann Cooney MOORE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF SAN JOSE; San Jose Police Department; Ted Tedesco; ClintonHilliard, Defendants, and San Jose Peace Officers' Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Nos. 77-2874, 77-3087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 1, 1980. Ronald Yank, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for san jose. Jacqueline Stewart, Wylie, Blunt & McBride, San Jose, Cal., Willie Lott, Jr., Oakland, Cal., for Moore. Lutz Alexander Prager, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before DUNIWAY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, * District Judge. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: 1 These are appeals from a judgment of the district court approving as "fair, reasonable and adequate" a settlement agreement (the Agreement) between the fourteen named plaintiffs (the Assistant Policewomen) and the original defendant, the City of San Jose, but opposed by the intervenor, the San Jose Peace Officers' Association (the Association), and dismissing all claims by the…