Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corporation v. Best Seam Incorporated, Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corporation v. Vectron Industries, Inc. And Eugene J. Tasse

Good Law
616 F.2d 1133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 198077-3721California6,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

616 F.2d 1133 206 U.S.P.Q. 213 , 1980-2 Trade Cases 63,290 CARPET SEAMING TAPE LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEST SEAM INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. CARPET SEAMING TAPE LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VECTRON INDUSTRIES, INC. and Eugene J. Tasse, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 77-3721, 77-3722. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 9, 1980. 1 Peter R. Taft, Munger, Tolles & Rickershause, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for plaintiff-appellant; Laurence H. Pretty, Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief. 2 William H. Pavitt, Jr., Smyth, Pavitt, Siegemond, Jones & Martella, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 4 Before CHAMBERS and TANG, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, * District Judge. ORRICK, District Judge: 5 In this case involving the validity and enforceability of a number of patents on products and processes used in seaming carpets, at the close of the plaintiff's case the trial judge held invalid a patent which was not in suit on the grounds of fraud against the Patent Office. The trial court then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.