United States v. Parviz Banafshe
Opinion
Opinion
Tang, J.
Parviz Banafshe appeals the judgment of the district court revoking his naturalization as a citizen of the United States on the ground that, under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (a) and (d), he lacked the intent to reside permanently in the United States at the time he filed his petition for naturalization. Banafshe contends that the rebuttable presumption in § 1451(d) which presumes that persons who become permanent foreign residents within five years after naturalization lacked the intent to become permanent United States citizens at the time of their application, is unconstitutional. Banafshe further contends that, even if the presumption is constitutional, he produced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption. We find that the presumption is not unconstitutional and was not rebutted by Banafshe, and affirm the judgment of the district court.
Banafshe, a native citizen of Iran, entered the United States as a visitor'in 1963 when he was 21 years old. That same year, he married a United States citizen and adjusted his status to that of a permanent resident alien. The marriage ended by annulment within a year.
Banafshe continued to reside in the United States, and in 1969 filed a petition…