Allis-Chalmers Corporation v. Harvey L. Arnold, Jr., District Engineer of United States Corps of Engineers v. Sulzer Bros., Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

Good Law
619 F.2d 44·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 198078-1895California1,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

619 F.2d 44 27 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 80,423 ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harvey L. ARNOLD, Jr., District Engineer of United States Corps of Engineers, Defendant-Appellee, v. SULZER BROS., INC., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 78-1895. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 19, 1980. Ernest Bonyhadi, Portland, Or., Loren K. Olson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant. Jack G. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before SKELTON, * Senior Judge, Court of Claims and FARRIS and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This suit was brought by Allis-Chalmers, a Delaware corporation, to prevent the Army Corps of Engineers from awarding a contract to a Swiss firm, Sulzer Bros., Inc., to supply the Bonneville Dam with two fishwater turbines. In its amended complaint in district court, the appellant challenged the lawfulness of the Corps' proposed action and sought an injunction and "such further relief as may be just and proper." The district court denied the injunction and subsequently dismissed the complaint. We find that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.