Royal Printing Company v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

Good Law
621 F.2d 323·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18186
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 198077-3005California3,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

621 F.2d 323 1980-2 Trade Cases 63,310 ROYAL PRINTING COMPANY and Haythornewhite Enterprises, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP., Crown Zellerbach Corp., Boise Cascade Corp., Scott Paper Corp., International Paper Co., Great Northern Nekoosa, Union Camp Corp., Weyerhaeuser Co., Westvaco Corp., and St. Regis Paper Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-3005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 28, 1980. Susan Y. Illston, Cotchett, Hutchinson & Dyer, San Mateo, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert D. Raven, Kurt W. Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., John T. Anderson, Richard K. Decker, Chicago, Ill., H. Richard Wachtel, New York City, Robert B. Owen, Washington, D. C., Norman M. Heisman, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants-appellees; Morrison & Foerster, James K. Haynes, Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., Howard T. Milman, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, John P. Borgwardt, Portland, Or., Max L. Gillam, Los Angeles, Cal., Marvin D. Morganstein, San Francisco, Cal., John Bates, San Francisco, Cal., Byron E. Kabot, New York City, J. Thomas Rosch, San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.