Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt

Good Law
623 F.2d 115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 198078-2629California1,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

623 F.2d 115 14 ERC 1842 , 10 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,681 BURBANK ANTI-NOISE GROUP, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil E. GOLDSCHMIDT, * etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. The State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation; Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.; and Hollywood-Burbank Airport Authority, Intervenors- Defendants- Appellees. No. 78-2629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 14, 1980. Michael M. Berger, Santa Monica, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Donald M. Pach, Sacramento, Cal., for Hollywood-Burbank Airport Authority. Peter R. Steenland, Jr., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued for defendants-appellees; Edward J. Connor, Jr., Dept. of Transp., San Diego, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Central District of California. Before KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, ** District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants Burbank Anti-Noise Group, et al., appeal the adverse summary judgment entered by the District Court on May 8, 1978, involving an interpretation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as it applies to an agreement for the purchase of the Hollywood-Burbank Airport…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.