Peninsula Air Delivery v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

Good Law
629 F.2d 611·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13396
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 198078-2099California1,907 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

This appeal presents two questions: (1) whether the decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to issue a certificate of registration to Blue Ribbon Express (BR) was supported by the record; and (2) whether the procedure followed complied with the Interstate Commerce Act. We affirm the Commission’s issuance of the certificate of registration.

FACTS

In 1976, Blue Ribbon Express (BR) applied to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the ICC for a certificate of registration under § 206(a)(6) of the Interstate Commerce Act. 49 U.S.C. § 306 (a)(6). Peninsula Air Delivery (PAD), a competitor, opposed its application.

Section 206(a)(6) provides a streamlined certification procedure for motor carriers engaging in interstate commerce incidental to their intrastate operations. The carrier’s application is considered initially by the appropriate state agency. If it decides to authorize the incidental interstate operation, it must recite in the record that: (1) notice by publication in the Federal Register was given to interested persons; (2) they had a reasonable opportunity to be heard; (3) it “duly considered the question of the proposed interstate and foreign…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.