Sven Tveter v. Ab Turn-O-Matic

Good Law
633 F.2d 831·209 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 22·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11744
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 198077-2299California4,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

633 F.2d 831 209 U.S.P.Q. 22 Sven TVETER, an individual, doing business as SGT Enterprises, Defendant- Appellant, v. AB TURN-O-MATIC, a Swedish corporation, and Scandus, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees. No. 77-2299. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 4, 1980. Jack M. Wiseman, San Jose, Cal., argued, for defendant-appellant. George C. Limbach, Limbach, Limbach & Sutton, William Rochester, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WALLACE, Circuit Judge, and CURTIS, * District Judge. BROWNING, Chief Judge: 1 Appellant Tveter produces and distributes "Take-A-Turn," a device for dispensing numbered tickets to persons awaiting service. Appellee AB Turn-O-Matic produces "Turn-O-Matic," a similar device performing the same function. The "Turn-O-Matic" device is distributed in the United States by appellee Scandus, Inc. It was first on the market. The district court held that appellant had infringed appellees' patent and trademark rights, and that appellant had unfairly competed with appellees by simulating the appearance of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.