Hummell v. Rykoff & Co.

634 F.2d 446 2 Employee Benefits Ca 1416 Burton H. HUMMELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. S. E. RYKOFF & CO., a corporation; D. M. Hansen, as Administrator of the S. E.Rykoff & Co. Profit-Sharing Trust Plan and S. E. Rykoff & Co. AmendedProfit-Sharing Plan; Roger W. Coleman, as a member of the Advisory Committee ofthe S. E. Rykoff& Co. Profit-Sharing Trust Plan and S. E. Rykoff & Co. Amended Profit-SharingPlan; and Samuel H. Maslon, as a member of the Advisory Committee of the S. E.Rykoff & Co. Profit-Sharing Trust Plan and S. E. Rykoff & Co. AmendedProfit-Sharing Plan,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 79-3165, 79-3178. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Nov. 3, 1980. Submitted Nov. 17, 1980. Decided Dec. 22, 1980. Arthur Grebow, Cruikshank, Antin & Grebow, Beverly Hills, Cal., for hummell. Hyman Edelman, Maslon, Kaplan, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Minneapolis, Minn., for Hansen. On Appeal from the United States District Court of the Central District of California. Before WRIGHT and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and SPEARS, Senior District Judge. * EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION 1 Appellants S. E. Rykoff and Co., et al…