City of South Pasadena v. Neil Goldschmidt v. City of Pasadena, Intervenor-Appellant, and City of Alhambra, Intervenor-Appellant, and City of Los Angeles, Intervenor-Appellant

Good Law
637 F.2d 677·11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20102·15 ERC (BNA) 1825·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14477
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 198179-3189California2,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

637 F.2d 677 15 ERC 1825 CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Neil GOLDSCHMIDT et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. CITY OF PASADENA, Intervenor-Appellant, and City of Alhambra, Intervenor-Appellant, and City of Los Angeles, Intervenor-Appellant. Nos. 79-3189, 79-3201 and 79-3213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1980. Decided April 9, 1981. Leland C. Dolley & Royal M. Sorensen, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Los Angeles, Cal., for City of Alhambra. Myrtle Dankers, Los Angeles, Cal., for City of Los Angeles. Robert W. Vidor, Alletta d'A. Belin, Los Angeles, Cal., for Goldschmidt; Joseph A. Montoya, Susan L. Durbin, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WRIGHT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SPEARS, Senior District Judge. * EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 The petition for rehearing is denied. The suggestion to modify the opinion of January 23, 1981 is granted. The earlier opinion is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted. 2 This case involves actions taken by a California highway agency. We affirm the district court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.