Horacio Ramos Miranda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Bad Law
638 F.2d 83·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12740
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 198079-7370California220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilkins, J.

Miranda seeks judicial review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision. Said decision dismissed the appeal of the order of deportation and of the denial of petitioner’s application for adjustment of status or for voluntary departure. Petitioner argues that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) should be es-topped from denying him the status of permanent resident pursuant to the provisions of Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 , due to its delay in processing an immediate relative visa petition filed by his then wife on his behalf. The Board found no evidence of any “affirmative misconduct” by a Service officer regarding the denial of the visa petition. We reverse.

The unexplained failure of the INS to act on the visa petition for an eighteen-month period prior to the petitioner’s withdrawal following the breakup of Miranda’s marriage was affirmative misconduct by the INS. See Villena v. INS, 622 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1980) (en banc); Sun II Yoo v. INS, 534 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1976).

The matter will be remanded for consideration of Miranda’s application for permanent residence under the circumstances as they existed at the time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.