Saharoff v. Stone

Good Law
638 F.2d 90·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12440
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 198079-7626California1,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

638 F.2d 90 Paul N. SAHAROFF, Petitioner, v. James M. STONE, Read P. Dunn, David G. Gartner and Robert L. Martin, Commissioners of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, an independent regulatory agency of the United States of America, Respondent. No. 79-7626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 14, 1980. Decided Nov. 10, 1980. C. H. de S. Harris, Stanford, Cal., argued for petitioner. Oren O'Neill, Sacramento, Cal., Paul M. Architzel, Washington, D. C., argued for respondent. On Petition to Review The Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Before WRIGHT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, District Judge. * EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 Saharoff seeks review of an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. We dismiss his appeal because he has not filed a bond as required by statute and an order of this court. I. 2 Saharoff was registered under the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (1976), as a "person associated" with a futures commission merchant. A customer, Leonard Stock, initiated a reparations proceeding pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 18 , alleging Saharoff had cheated and defrauded him. After a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.