United States v. Randolph L. Fulton

Good Law
57 A.L.R. Fed. 531·640 F.2d 1104·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18796
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 198180-1364California1,522 words

Opinion

Opinion

Keep, J.

Randolph Fulton was convicted by a jury of seventeen counts of aiding and abetting embezzlement by receiving and endorsing unauthorized checks in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 656 and Section 2. Defendant appeals on two grounds: (1) § 656 does not apply to embezzlement of funds from a mortgage company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an insured bank and (2) the district judge erred in not giving defendant’s proposed accomplice testimony instruction. We affirm the judgment of conviction.

I. Facts

Defendant Fulton was charged with aiding and abetting a mortgage company employee in embezzling funds from the mortgage company in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656 . Specifically, Fulton was charged with knowingly receiving and endorsing a number of unauthorized checks from Mrs. Jesse Jones Edwards, an employee of Peoples Mortgage Company.

At trial, Mrs. Edwards testified that, at her husband’s request and without authorization, she issued checks drawn on various escrow accounts of her employer Peoples Mortgage Company. Mrs. Edwards also admitted that she had discussed splitting the proceeds of the checks with defendant and her husband. Another accomplice, Valerie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.