Mlikotin v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
643 F.2d 652
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 198179-3477California594 words

Opinion

Opinion

643 F.2d 652 Alex T. MLIKOTIN and Elvira M. Mlikotin, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and members of the City Council, etc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-3477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1981. Decided April 23, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1981. Bennett Rolfe, LeBel & Rolfe, Santa Monica, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Norman L. Roberts, Asst. City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges and TEMPLAR * , District Judge. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs are residents of the Venice Canal area of the City of Los Angeles. They filed this action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the city and members of the Los Angeles City Council. The theory of their action is that over a period of years, while the neighborhood was inhabited by poorer residents, the area received inadequate municipal services, and that plaintiffs' property thus has less value than it would otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.