23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 287, 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1285, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,996, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,839 Lura Lee Saulsbury v. Wismer and Becker, Inc.

644 F.2d 1251 23 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 287 , 25 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1285 , 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,996 , 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,839 Lura Lee SAULSBURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISMER AND BECKER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-2855. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1979. Decided June 6, 1980. As Amended May 15, 1981. Mary K. Gillespie, Santa Barbara, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant; Burton D. Fretz, Washington, D. C., Willard Hastings, Jr., Santa Barbara, Cal., on brief. J. Michael Phelps, San Francisco, Cal., argued for defendant-appellee; Robert M. Lieber, Alan B. Carlson, J. Michael Phelps, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal arises from the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant Wismer & Becker, Inc. in an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court held that Saulsbury had not timely filed with the appropriate state agency, because she had not…