United States v. Ali Asghar Taheri

Good Law
648 F.2d 598·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 198179-1711California1,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction on three counts of charges related to drug possession. The case was tried to the Court on stipulated facts. Two issues are presented for review. The first is the admissibility of evidence of heroin seized pursuant to a warrant, but originally discovered in an initial search which had been conducted without a warrant and without probable cause. The second issue is whether, assuming the heroin was inadmissible, the defendant’s post-arrest consent to other searches, which yielded opium, was sufficient to purge the primary taint. We reverse all of the convictions.

On May 30, 1979, an informant of unknown reliability supplied a DEA agent with the description of a person who was allegedly selling heroin from a certain motel. The agent verified with the motel clerk that a man who matched the informant’s description, appellant Ali Taheri, had been staying at the motel but had hurriedly checked out. A few days later, the motel clerk advised the agent that Taheri had returned to the motel and had stated that a package was to arrive for him in the near future. That afternoon the clerk called again and reported that a package had arrived.

An agent went to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.