26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 601, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,921 Carole A. Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Union of Flight Attendants, Local 1 v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
648 F.2d 1223
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 198179-3215California4,120 words

Opinion

Opinion

648 F.2d 1223 26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 601 , 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,921 Carole A. GERDOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. UNION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, LOCAL 1, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 79-3215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1981. Decided June 22, 1981. Jay D. Roth, Taylor, Roth & Grant, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant; Barrett D. Litt (on brief). Willard Z. Carr, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee; H. Frederick Tepker, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Michael Ryan, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before SNEED and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON * , District Judge. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 The plaintiffs contend that Continental Airlines' weight requirements for its flight attendants violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1976), because they discriminate on the basis of sex. They advance both adverse impact and disparate treatment arguments in support of their claim. We affirm the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.