William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor

Good Law
650 F.2d 1055·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11530
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 198180-7020California1,580 words

Opinion

Opinion

Poole, J.

William F. Lanning appeals a determination by the Secretary of Labor denying weekly layoff benefits available to displaced forest industry workers under the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978 (Redwood Act) 16 U.S.C. § 79b. The decision followed a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge of the California Unemployment Insurance Board. The Secretary of Labor ruled that at the time appellant was rendered an “affected employee” by partial layoff as he had less than the five years of creditable service required to be eligible for full benefits under the Act. We affirm.

I

Because this is the first case in which we are required to interpret the Redwood Act, some statutory background is in order. The Redwood Act was enacted to increase the acreage of Redwood National Park and to provide economic assistance in the form of weekly layoff benefits, severance payments and relocation allowances to employees affected by the expansion. To insure that employees of the forest products industry would not be forced to suffer personal hardship as a result of the park expansion, the Act contains provisions to maintain the income and benefits of affected employees and includes economic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.