Omark Industries, Inc. v. The Carlton Company and Raymond Carlton

Good Law
652 F.2d 783·212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 413·1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11691
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 198078-3265California2,786 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

Appellant Omark Industries (hereinafter “Omark”) appeals from a judgment invalidating its patent for a brush cutting chain invented by appellee Raymond Carlton. The district court found that the brush-cutting chain had been in public use more than one year before May of 1959 when the patent was applied for and held the patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 . For the reasons stated below, we concur with the findings of the district court, 458 F.Supp. 449 , and affirm its judgment.

FACTS

Omark designs, manufactures, and markets saw chains for use on motorized chain saws. Between 1955 and 1957, appellee Raymond Carlton [“Carlton”], then chief engineer at Omark, designed a saw chain for use in cutting small tree limbs and brush [hereinafter “brush-cutting chain,” “chain”].

In early 1957, Omark’s engineering department undertook substantial field testing of the brush-cutting chain at the site of the North Fork Reservoir on the Clackamas River in Oregon. Members of the engineering department personally placed samples of the brush-cutting chain on the saws of workers cleaning brush on the dam site, and demonstrated to the workers the proper use of the chain. No restrictions were placed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.