Adolph Lyons v. City of Los Angeles, Doe Crupi, Doe Hills, Doe Sandoval and Doe Lloyd

Good Law
656 F.2d 417
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 198180-6078, 81-5023California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adolph Lyons in 1977 commenced a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Los Angeles, seeking damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief. After an appeal to this court had restored two counts of the complaint that had been dismissed by a partial summary judgment, Lyons obtained a preliminary injunction which forbids police officers to use carotid artery or bar arm strangleholds under circumstances that do not threaten death or great bodily harm to the officer. Both sides appeal.

This court will not disturb an order granting a preliminary injunction unless it was an abuse of discretion by the district court. Miss Universe, Inc. v. Flesh er, 605 F.2d 1130 , 1133-34 (9th Cir.1979); Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Com’n v. Nat. Football, 634 F.2d 1197 , 1200-01 (9th Cir.1980). All the trial judge has done, so far, is to tell the city that its police officers may not apply life threatening strangleholds to persons stopped in routine police work unless the application of such force is necessary to prevent serious bodily harm to an officer. This relatively innocuous interference by the judiciary with police practice can hardly be characterized as an abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.