Excess And Casualty Reinsurance Association v. Insurance Commissioner Of The State Of California

Good Law
656 F.2d 491·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17810
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 198179-3315California4,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

656 F.2d 491 EXCESS AND CASUALTY REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as liquidator of Signal Insurance Company and Imperial Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee, and Insurance Department of the State of Florida, as ancillary receiver of Signal Insurance Company and Imperial Insurance Company; Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 79-3315, 79-3321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 1981. Decided Sept. 14, 1981. Klinger & Leevan, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Mark E. Field, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Edmond B. Mamer, Dep. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for Insurance Commissioner of California. John M. McNatt, Jr., and Paul S. Leevan, Mathews, Osborne, Enrlich, McNatt, Gobleman & Cobb, Jacksonville, Fla., for Florida Insurance Guaranty. Charles W. Havens, III, Washington, D.C., for Reinsurance Assn. of America. Peter M. Appleton, Tyre & Kamins, Los Angeles, Cal., for the State of Florida. Wayne D. Wilson, Wilson, Elser, Edelman & Dicker, Los Angeles, Cal., for Dep. Atty. Gen. for State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.