Excess And Casualty Reinsurance Association v. Insurance Commissioner Of The State Of California
Opinion
Opinion
656 F.2d 491 EXCESS AND CASUALTY REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as liquidator of Signal Insurance Company and Imperial Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee, and Insurance Department of the State of Florida, as ancillary receiver of Signal Insurance Company and Imperial Insurance Company; Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 79-3315, 79-3321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 1981. Decided Sept. 14, 1981. Klinger & Leevan, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Mark E. Field, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Edmond B. Mamer, Dep. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for Insurance Commissioner of California. John M. McNatt, Jr., and Paul S. Leevan, Mathews, Osborne, Enrlich, McNatt, Gobleman & Cobb, Jacksonville, Fla., for Florida Insurance Guaranty. Charles W. Havens, III, Washington, D.C., for Reinsurance Assn. of America. Peter M. Appleton, Tyre & Kamins, Los Angeles, Cal., for the State of Florida. Wayne D. Wilson, Wilson, Elser, Edelman & Dicker, Los Angeles, Cal., for Dep. Atty. Gen. for State of…