City of Anaheim, California v. Duncan

Good Law
658 F.2d 1326
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 198179-3803California3,269 words

Opinion

Opinion

658 F.2d 1326 CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, City of Riverside, California, and City of Banning, California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Charles W. DUNCAN, * individually and as Secretary of Energy, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-3803. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1981. Decided Oct. 13, 1981. Daniel I. Davidson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert L. Klarquist, Washington, D. C., Daniel J. McAuliffe, Phoenix, Ariz., argued for defendants-appellees; Richard S. Allemann, Asst. U. S. Atty., Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before GOODWIN, SKOPIL and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge. 1 The cities of Anaheim, Banning and Riverside appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees, various government officials and agencies and several private utility companies (hereinafter "the utilities"). This is the fourth appeal arising out of the Navajo thermal-generation power plant in Page, Arizona. 1 The Navajo plant eventually will supply power to the United States for the Central Arizona Project ("CAP"). See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.