United States v. Rudolph Marquest Torres, United States of America v. Jose Luis Buenrostro, United States of America v. Richard Stephen Montes, United States of America v. Ernesto Lopes Salsedo

Good Law
659 F.2d 1012
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 198181-1023California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

659 F.2d 1012 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Marquest TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis BUENROSTRO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Stephen MONTES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernesto Lopes SALSEDO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 81-1023 to 81-1025 and 81-1152. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1981. Decided Oct. 22, 1981. William J. Owen, Sacramento, Cal., for Salsedo. Julian C. Macias, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for the United States. Steven D. Bauer, Sacramento, Cal., for Torres. John F. Bowman, Fair Oaks, Cal., for Buenrostro. Sandra Gillies, Asst. Federal Defender, Sacramento, Cal., for Montes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento). Before GOODWIN and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, * Senior United States District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Defendants were convicted of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 471 (manufacture of counterfeit federal reserve notes). Defendant Salsedo was also convicted of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.