Philco-Ford Corporation v. Abe

Good Law
661 F.2d 776·25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 185·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16012
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 198178-1506California4,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

661 F.2d 776 25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 185, 92 Lab.Cas. P 34,093 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE WORKERS, DRIVERS & HELPERS, TEAMSTERS LOCAL # 427, Plaintiff, and Roger T. Abe, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PHILCO-FORD CORPORATION, WDL DIVISION, formerly known as Aeronutronic Ford Corporation, and now known as Ford Aerospace & Communications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 78-1506. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1980. Decided Nov. 16, 1981. 1 Lawrence I. Weisman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Jared H. Jossem, Torkildson, Katz, Jossem & Loden, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellee. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. 4 Before KENNEDY and HUG, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS * , District Judge. SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge: 5 The primary issue in this case is whether the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended, 41 U.S.C. § 351 et seq., permits the employees of a successor contractor to a government service contract to maintain a private right of action under the Act against their employer for alleged violations of the Act. The secondary issues concern alleged fraud and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.