Carole Patricia ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
661 F.2d 796·27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,213·27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 571·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16018
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 198179-3466California2,276 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

Roberts appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for appellee Arizona Board of Regents [Board] in her suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The court held that (1) Roberts’ claim of retaliatory discharge was barred for failure to meet the'jurisdictional prerequisites of Title VII or to be timely asserted; (2) all allegations of sex discrimination based on events which occurred prior to June 1, 1975 were barred by Title VIPs time limitations provision, § 706(e); and (3) the Board was entitled to summary judgment on all of the non-time barred allegations. 477 F.Supp. 28 . We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I.

Roberts commenced employment with the Department of Police at Arizona State University on July 6, 1970. On September 10, 1975, while still employed by the Department of Police, Roberts attempted to file with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] a charge of discrimination on the basis of sex in wages, training, qualifications, testing, promotions, job assignments, seniority, job classification and job advertisement. On November 28, 1975, Roberts filed a similar charge with the Arizona Civil Rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.