Johann Schmidt v. Oakland Unified School District

Good Law
662 F.2d 550·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16305
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 198180-4005California5,748 words

Opinion

Opinion

662 F.2d 550 1 Ed. Law Rep. 72 Johann SCHMIDT and Leland Pollard, Individually and Doing Business as Schmidt & Pollard, a Partnership; Jot Brown, Luz Brown, and Jot Brown, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Oakland Board of Education, David Tucker, Jr., Melvin J. Caughell, Charles W. Goady, Barney E. Hilburn, Lorenzo N. Hoopes, Seymour M. Rose, and Peggy Stinnett, Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-4005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1981. Decided Nov. 5, 1981. Roger J. Marzulla, Matthews & Marzulla, San Jose, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Michales S. Sorgen, Oakland, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before SKOPIL, FLETCHER and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 At issue in this appeal is the validity of an affirmative action plan (AAP) applicable to general contractors who submit bids for construction contracts solicited by the Oakland Unified School District (School District). Under Cal.Educ.Code § 39640, a school district must award to the "lowest responsible bidder"…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.