Roy Huey v. Teledyne, Inc.

Good Law
662 F.2d 621·33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 920·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 198180-5200California449 words

Opinion

Opinion

662 F.2d 621 Roy HUEY, in behalf of himself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TELEDYNE, INC., a corporate entity; Henry E. Singleton, George A. Roberts, George Kosmetsky, Robert C. Jackson, Arthur Rock and Claude E. Shannon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-5200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1981. Decided Nov. 27, 1981. David Daar, Miller & Daar, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Gregory R. Smith, Irell & Manella, William A. Masterson, Rogers & Wells, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; Edmund M. Kaufman, Los Angeles, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE and TANG, Circuit Judges and TURRENTINE, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 This matter is before us again after remand. The history of this litigation is fully chronicled in Huey v. Teledyne, Inc. (Huey I), 608 F.2d 1234 (9th Cir. 1979). To summarize the facts, Huey's action against Teledyne, Inc. was dismissed with prejudice by the district court in 1977 for want of prosecution. Huey appealed to this court, seeking review of the dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.